(no subject)
Sep. 29th, 2008 11:41 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

I do wish he'd turn out at least one more 1980s-style cyberpunk novel though. He says it can't be done, but I think it can. You just write the thing like it's still 1983 and you're speculating on life in the 21st century.
Which is precisely how they should shoot a film of Neuromancer, in my opinion: CDs don't exist, music and data is stored on tape, and Coke still comes in bottles with caps or cans with ring pulls. The net is scary VR, computers are greenscreens and people are still deeply social in meatspace: bars, clubs, bands, poker games, road trips, kitbashed communities, artists, streetcorner prophets. No 'social networking applications.' No blogs. No mobile phones. No email. People who know how to put one foot in front of the other without Googling it first. The lateral repurposing of cast off high tech by the cast out low life.
Putting Hayden Christiansen in it is not a good first move.
The articles I've found date from January. I'm hoping it doesn't fly. The guy who did Torque was directing, last I heard.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 02:07 pm (UTC)And I say that with William Gibson up there with Iain M. Banks as a personal favourite author and the one who woke me up to how damn good speculative fiction can be.
You want relevancy? Hayden Christensen had just turned three when "Neuromancer" was published.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 02:28 pm (UTC)Cam's idea is good, but won't work.
Where are the marketing ops?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 11:24 pm (UTC)The problem with writing a novel like that is that it would be deliberately retro. The orginal Sprawl trilogy was trying to say something about the future. Another novel in that vein would be steampunk with chrome instead of brass -- it would be about the past.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:16 am (UTC)It would be possible, I suppose, to extrapolate on future trends and society from this point forward, but it wouldn't be cyberpunk (nanopunk?). Furthermore I wonder if it'd be as interesting as cyberpunk was, by dint of the rise of a kind of omniscience via Google, surveillance, etc. It's hard to have a good chase movie when mobile phone towers, GPS, credit card transactions and urban security cameras do the work of the antagonist. The Jason Bourne novels do okay within the framework, but No Country For Old Men couldn't have.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:06 am (UTC)Fact is, retro scifi is making a comeback by way of steampunk, and increasingly films are setting stories in a pre-Google era because everyday omniscience sucks the drama from a story.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:10 am (UTC)I was being snarky about the Hollywood system and the lack of marketing tie-ins. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:04 am (UTC)Eh. Wait and see I guess.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 11:46 pm (UTC)How are you liking Spook Country? I enjoyed it, but I think Pattern Recognition was stronger.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:18 am (UTC)Spook Country's a solid book, but it lacks when stacked against his previous stuff. Pattern Recogntion felt like a 3.5 or 4 out of 5. This is a solid 3, IMO.
Give generously so that he may die
Date: 2008-09-30 01:31 am (UTC)I still think Gibsons greatest work is Johnny Mnemonic. It's fifteen pages stamped indelibly on my brain like a white-hot literary brand.
Re: Give generously so that he may die
Date: 2008-09-30 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:59 am (UTC)I don't know if Hayden's gonna be in the movie, last I checked imdb quickly took down his name because it was just (?) a rumour. Unfortunately I don't think the novel can be adapted competently to film. D:
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 07:33 am (UTC)SC is next on my list, I'm currently on Pattern Recognition. And I, too, wish sorely that he'd put one more cyberpunk novel in for the team.
:)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 03:31 am (UTC)