(no subject)

I do wish he'd turn out at least one more 1980s-style cyberpunk novel though. He says it can't be done, but I think it can. You just write the thing like it's still 1983 and you're speculating on life in the 21st century.
Which is precisely how they should shoot a film of Neuromancer, in my opinion: CDs don't exist, music and data is stored on tape, and Coke still comes in bottles with caps or cans with ring pulls. The net is scary VR, computers are greenscreens and people are still deeply social in meatspace: bars, clubs, bands, poker games, road trips, kitbashed communities, artists, streetcorner prophets. No 'social networking applications.' No blogs. No mobile phones. No email. People who know how to put one foot in front of the other without Googling it first. The lateral repurposing of cast off high tech by the cast out low life.
Putting Hayden Christiansen in it is not a good first move.
The articles I've found date from January. I'm hoping it doesn't fly. The guy who did Torque was directing, last I heard.
no subject
And I say that with William Gibson up there with Iain M. Banks as a personal favourite author and the one who woke me up to how damn good speculative fiction can be.
You want relevancy? Hayden Christensen had just turned three when "Neuromancer" was published.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
How are you liking Spook Country? I enjoyed it, but I think Pattern Recognition was stronger.
(no subject)
Give generously so that he may die
Re: Give generously so that he may die
no subject
I don't know if Hayden's gonna be in the movie, last I checked imdb quickly took down his name because it was just (?) a rumour. Unfortunately I don't think the novel can be adapted competently to film. D:
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
SC is next on my list, I'm currently on Pattern Recognition. And I, too, wish sorely that he'd put one more cyberpunk novel in for the team.
:)
(no subject)