![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
I think James Cameron called these things Hunter-Killers.
Still, once your robot blows someone's legs off... sell them robot legs.*
Whee.
God, we are so fucked sometimes.
My only hope is that with the rise of the Chinese as the major world power we'll see at least a little decline in world conflict. They don't seem like a war economy.
*AFAIK these are the products of two separate companies, but you just know that at some point a landmine manufacturer is going to get into prosthetics. Isn't Motorola the world's biggest landmine maker?
no subject
Vertical marketing they call it...
no subject
Nope, not an insidious, self-perpetuating business-model at all. :-P
Seriously, though, they're unrelated so I'll stop with the jokes about "synergies".
They're both clever designs catering to a specific purpose. Part of me really admires the ingenuity it takes to think-up such machines, build and test them. But, despite arguments that one of them is saving lives by removing human occupants, I have some serous moral hangups.
WRT the legs, they're nice but there's a couple of more innovative approaches. One uses implanted nerve-sensors to get signals from now-redundant nerves. Eg: if you lose an arm but the nerve-fibres terminating at your shoulder still work, they can now make use of 'em.
Another possibility I'd like to see explored would use non-implant brain-sensors. As with all the best new tech these days, the "serious" research has chimps doing one or two things and but the "fun" stuff allows humans to play console games. In 20 years' time, your prosthetic legs will be powered by a Sony PS7.
no subject
Which will save on the legs' battery life as the operator will rarely be using them. :P
Still though, I find this all really interesting. Can't wait to see where we are in five years.